Announcement PDF RNS Number : 3309X East Star Resources PLC 17 February 2025 17 February 2025 East Star Resources Plc ("East Star" or the "Company") VMS Copper Drilling Results Results expected to add tonnes to existing resources and lower strip ratio of open pit development East Star Resources Plc (LSE:EST), which is exploring for copper and gold in Kazakhstan, is pleased to provide initial drill results from Q4 2024 drilling at the Verkhuba Copper Deposit ("Verkhuba") in the East Region of Kazakhstan. Assays from all 238 core samples taken from three drill holes have been received with several new mineralised zones intersected. Highlights: · All holes intersected ore grade mineralisation · Mineralisation is recorded outside the current modelled ore bodies but within the open pit shell, potentially leading to a Mineral Resource increase · Intercepts include: Hole_ID VU_24_DD_007A Intercept VU_24_DD_008A 0.7m @ 2.94% Cu and 0.17% Zn from 60.1m 4.0m @ 0.69% Cu from 210.1m including 0.5m @ 2.59% Cu from 211.8m 0.6m @ 1.99% Cu from 54.2m 5.1m @ 1.43% Cu from 170.2m 0.5m @ 1.63% Cu from 221.5m VU_24_DD_027A 1.4m @ 2.88% Zn and 0.28% Cu from 172.8m Alex Walker, East Star CEO, commented: "We are very pleased with these results, having drilled outside the current resource envelope and intersected numerous ore grade intervals. In the current open pit model, provided by AMC Consulting, these new intersections that were previously classified as waste will now be converted to ore. This supports our view that the ore lenses comprising the current resource model extend further and so additional drilling in these areas will potentially grow the resource and improve the economics. It is important to note that the three drill holes completed were not targeting the thickest, shallowest or highest-grade portions of the resource and so we look forward to getting the drill rig turning again in Q2 2025." Further Information The new intervals were intercepted within the previously modelled open pitshell but outside ofEast Star's 2024 Verkhuba Mineral Resource Estimate (See Figure 1).The mineralised intervals appear to correlate withthe same stratigraphic unit as existing modelled ore bodies, allowing these to join up along strike and therefore these drill results should add tonnes to the existing resources and lower the strip ratio of an open pit development. Holes VU_24_DD_007A and VU_24_DD_008A infilled gaps in the southern part of the deposit to approximately 100m drill spacing.Highlighted intercepts were reported using cut off grades of 0.3% for copper and 0.8% for zinc and limit of 2m maximum consecutive internal waste. Figure 1: 2024 drilling demonstrating ore in gaps in the current resource envelope East Star Resources Plc Alex Walker, Chief Executive Officer Tel: +44 (0)20 7390 0234 (via Vigo Consulting) SI Capital (Corporate Broker) Nick Emerson Tel: +44 (0)1483 413 500 Vigo Consulting (Investor Relations) Ben Simons / Peter Jacob Tel: +44 (0)20 7390 0234 About East Star Resources Plc East Star Resources is focused on the discovery and development of copper and gold in Kazakhstan. East Star's management are based permanently on the ground, supported by local expertise. The Company is pursuing three exploration strategies: · A Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (VMS) discovery with a maiden JORC MRE of 20.3Mt @ 1.16% copper, 1.54% zinc and 0.27% lead, in an infrastructure-rich region, amenable to a low capex development · Copper porphyry and epithermal gold exploration, with multiple opportunities for Tier 1 deposits, supported by an initial $500k grant from BHP Xplor in 2024 · Sediment-hosted copper exploration with Getech where the initial targeting strategy is at no cost to East Star Visit our website: www.eaststarplc.com Follow us on social media: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/east-star-resources/ X (formerly Twitter): https://twitter.com/EastStar_PLC Subscribe to our email alert service to be notified whenever East Star releases news: www.eaststarplc.com/newsalerts The person who arranged for the release of this announcement was Alex Walker, CEO of the Company. Competent Person Statement Scientific or technical information in this disclosure related to exploration was reviewed by Dr Tremain Woods, a full-time employee of Discovery Ventures Kazakhstan Ltd, a 100% owned subsidiary of East Star Resources PLC. Dr Woods is a member in good standing with the Geological Society of South Africa. He has sufficient experience that is relevant to the commodity, style of mineralization or type of deposit under consideration and activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person under the JORC code (2012 Edition). JORC Code, 2012 Edition - Table 1 Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Criteria JORC Code explanation Sampling techniques · Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. · Samples were taken from half drill core through sulphid · Sampling was conducted through mineralized intervals the hanging wall and footwall for intervals larger than 3 meters), only the mineralized portion is sampled. · Sample quality is ensured by a structured scheme, inclu materials (CRM), and duplicates. · Banks are inserted at the beginning and end of large, m smaller isolated intervals. · CRMs are inserted at every 50th and 100th sample to m · Coarse duplicates are taken every 40th and 80th sample portions, and 5% of mineralized pulps are sent for exte · Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. · A total of 191.4 meters of core were sampled, with 216 c 12 blanks, 5 CRMs, and 5 duplicate samples. · In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. · Core samples were prepared by ALS Kazgeochemistry L crushing, sieving (<70% passing 2mm), and milling (>85 · Samples are analysed using the ME-ICP41 method for ro ore samples, the ME-OG62 method is used. · Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Drilling techniques Drill sample recovery Commentary · Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, facesampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). · Drilling was conducted using stand HQ sized diamond drilling · Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. · Core recovery was measured by East Star geologists, an aver recorded for the three completed drill holes. · Positive Group Kazakhstan undertook drilling. · Drill core was orientated using a REFLEX Act III orientation to vertically were orientated once solid core was intersected. · After drilling was completed, all holes were survey at 50 m int survey tool · Through the mineralized intervals, core recovery was 97% an Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary · Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. · There is no relationship between Cu, Pb or Zn grades and rec · There does not appear to have been any bias due to sample · Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Logging · Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. · East Star geologists undertook core logging. · Quantitative data for mineralization, lithology, structure, alte was logged. · All recovered core was logged and photographed before and · Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. · The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation · If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. · Half core samples were collected for processing, the remainin East Star's core storage facilities in Verkhuba Village · If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. · Samples were crushed into chips; the chips were passed thro to obtain 500 g samples for milling. Crushed sample duplica homogeneity of crushed samples. · For all sample types, the nature, quality, and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. · Quality control procedures adopted for all subsampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. · Blank granite material was also inserted into the sample stre occurs during crushing or milling. · ALS laboratories weigh samples before and after sieving, to e fractions are met for each sample. · Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. · Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests · The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. · For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. · Aqua regia is a partial digest method well suited to base met internationally recognized and provides precise and accura · Standard assay quality controls are used by the laboratory a samples to evaluate and confirm the assay results. All QA/Q · Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. Verification of sampling and assaying · The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. · The use of twinned holes. · Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage · Significant intersections were confirmed visually by East Star independent verification has been completed to date. · Logged data was inspected by East Star's exploration manag data were made before data was sent to Rock Solid based i the maintained SQL database Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary (physical and electronic) protocols. · Discuss any adjustment to assay data. Location of data points · Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. · Specification of the grid system used. · Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Data spacing and distribution · Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. · Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. · Whether sample compositing has been applied. · Drill holes were surveyed using Garmin GPSMAP 62S handhe planned once all drilling is completed. · Grid system WGS83, UTM44N · Some errors were noted in the elevation readings (from 5 - 1 to the elevation values of the LIDAR topography survey at t · A drone LIDAR survey was conducted in 2023. The survey co used a drone mounted LIDAR sensor (DJI Zenmuse L1 Lidar D-RTK 2 drone) with a base station (Trimble R12 and Trimble lines were 90 m apart, and the resolution produced was 3.4 terrane model was checked against control points. · Historical drilling was drilled along NW-SE trending lines, the 300m apart and drill holes were spaced between 100 and 25 · Current drilling aims to infill the spacing to ~120m. · The current drill holes have reduced the spacing within the U AMC in April 2024 to ~100m. · Geological distribution is sufficient for inferred resources thr (from April 2024). Some parts have sufficient spacing to be c · Significant intercepts are reported for results from 2024 drilli parameters: Parameter Report 1 Report 2 R Element Cu Cu Z Min Cut-off Grade % 1 0.3% 0 Max Cut-off Grade % n/a n/a n Min Intercept Length (metres) n/a 2m n Maximum Consecutive Internal Waste (m) 2m 2m 2 Minimum Intercept Grade % n/a All (no filter) A fi Co-elements in report Pb, Zn Pb, Zn C · Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Sample security · Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. · If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralized structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. · The measures taken to ensure sample security. · Sampling is taken for all intervals with sulphide mineralizatio · Sampling adhered to lithological boundaries and additionally was sampled. · The ore body generally dips 30 to 40 to the SW. In some part steeper 80. These steeper areas of mineralization are interp mineralization deformation. · The ore body is cut by steep NE faults, these normal faults ar ore body 20-40 m · After samples are cut and bagged, they are sealed with zip tie Star's senior geologist to ALS Oskemen. · The samples remained sealed until handed over to the labor · Samples in the laboratory follow ALS standard procedures to Audits or reviews · The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results · No audits were undertaken for this phase of sampling. · The sample methodology was checked and confirmed by the MRE (April 2024) Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral tenement and land tenure status · Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. · The Verkhuba polymetallic deposit is located in the eastern part of exploration license 179 (the "License"). The license was issued to Discovery Ventures Kazakhstan Limited (the "D 27 July 2022 for initial period of 6 years with a possibility of further five years extension su reduction of the license area by 40%. · East Star resources have servitude for exploration from the local Akim (administrative hea license can be explored under these agreements. · There are no known legal or security impediments to obtaining a mining license · The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. Exploration done by other parties · Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. · Table of previously completed exploration Principal author, year Period Exploration Results Yakovlev et al., 1950 1948-1950 Geological mapping Geological map 1:10,000 Krysova et al., 1954 1953-1954 Geological mapping Geological map 1:10,000 Yusupov et al., 1956 1956 Geological traverses, core drilling Potential of oxidation zone Anoshin et al., 1972 1971-1972 Geological, geochemical survey, shallow prospecting shafts and drilling, ground IP, EM, magnetics, core drilling Follow-up targets, discovery mineralized zones at depth Rodionov, Gorelova, 1976 1974-1976 Geological traverses, deep drilling Follow-up targets, prognostic r Avdonin et al., 1977 1974-1977 Mapping of Devonian volcanic centres Follow-up targets, maps of proximal volcanic facies Nazarov, San'kov, 1986 1982-1986 Geological mapping at scale 1:50,000, ground IP, EM, magnetics, diamond drilling on the anomalies Prognostic resources Radchenko et al., 1987 1985-1987 Grid drilling 800-400 x 400-200 m, geochemical sampling, ground IP, EM, magnetics Follow-up targets, mineralization Grigorovich et al., 1990 1986-1988 Infill diamond drilling 200 x 400, 100 x 200, 75 x 100-180 m, underground development (an adit and drives) totalling 3001 m, metallurgical testing Completion of drilling databa Verkhuba deposit for follow-u trac Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Principal author, year Geology · Deposit type, geological setting, and style of mineralisation. Period Exploration Results Ermolaev et al., 1990 1990 Technical economic consideration of Verkhuba deposit ESR 2023 Exploration Target estimate Exploration (JORC) ESR 2024 Drilling of six verification and in-fill holes, topography survey, development of lithological model MRE report Mineral resource estimate categories (GKZ) Target estimat · Verkhuba is Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide (VMS) deposit. Historical reports indicate that type is felsic bimodal (or Kuroko-type). · The mineralization is lenticular massive and disseminated sulphides hosted in volcaniclast sub horizontal units. · Mineralisation occurs as a copper rich unit at shallower depths (<150 m) and a zinc-coppe deeper (~200m) · The area has seen post depositional deformation in the form of folding and faulting Drill hole Information · A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length. · If the exclusion of this information · Drill hole information: Drillhole Name VU_24_DD007A VU_24_DD008 VU_24_DD008A VU_24_DD027A X Y Z Dip Azimuth 603754 603661 603660 603488 5591358 5591388 5591397 5591275 402 466 466 494 -70 -65 -70 -90 340 335 5 0 Target Depth Current Depth Date Started D Com 280 260 260 251 270 110,5 268,0 251,0 11/17/2024 11/04/2024 12/12/2024 12/03/2024 11/2 11/1 12/1 12/1 · Significant intercepts: Hole_ID VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_027A Intercept 0.7m @ 2.94% Cu and 0.17% Zn from 60.1m 4.0m @ 0.69% Cu from 210.1m including 0.5m @ 2.59% Cu from 211.8m 0.6m @ 1.99% Cu from 54.2m 5.1m @ 1.43% Cu from 170.2m 0.5m @ 1.63% Cu from 221.5m 1.4m @ 2.88% Zn and 0.28% Cu from 172.8m · No material information has been excluded from this report Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. Data aggregation methods · In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cutoff grades are usually Material and should be stated. · Significant intercepts are reported for results from 2024 drilling using the following param Parameter Report 1 Report 2 Report 3 Element Cu Cu Zn Min Cut-off Grade % 1 0.3% 0.8% Max Cut-off Grade % n/a n/a n/a Min Intercept Length (metres) n/a 2m n/a Maximum Consecutive Internal Waste (m) 2m 2m 2m Minimum Intercept Grade % n/a All (no filter) All (no filter) Co-elements in report Pb, Zn Pb, Zn Cu, Pb · No metal equivalents are reported. · Results for 32 elements received, but only Cu, Pb Zn is reported. · Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of highgrade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. · The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths · These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. · The ore bodies are generally concordant to lithology (perpendicular to core axis). At some mineralization occurs as steeply dipping veins and veinlets with limited extent (low angle core axis). · Drill holes were planned at 65 - 70° towards the north to intercept mineralisation at perpe angles. Mineralisation is typically sub-horizontal in core indicating that the true thickness of the thickness of intervals in core. Therefore, one can assume that intervals thickness a drilled. Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary · If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. · If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width not known'). Diagrams · Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. · Relevant diagrams have been included in the body text Balanced reporting · Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practical, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. · Grades below the cut off parameters have not been reported with these results. However mineralization has been noted within East Star's models and will inform future estimates Other substantive exploration data · Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; · Not applicable Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. Further work · The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). · Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. Appendix 1: Assays Results · The three completed drill holes totalling 789 m of a planned 1,500 m of initial drilling. Shou drilling continue to provide satisfactory results a second phase of 3,000 m of infill drilling planned. · Map of planned and completed drillholes is included in the body text. Hole_ID VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_007A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A Depth_From 0 10.2 16 17 20.6 21.6 28.1 38 42 43 48.5 58.1 60.1 60.8 61.5 74.2 74.9 80.5 81.3 84.2 186.5 189 203.2 210.1 211 211.8 212.3 213.1 214.1 218.4 0 14.4 15.9 16.9 17.4 18 18.5 38.9 40.4 43.8 44.3 44.9 45.4 51.5 53.5 54.2 54.8 55.7 57.2 58 59 60.5 61.5 62 62.5 63.5 64.4 67.4 69.7 71.1 72 72.5 78.3 87 129.8 130.3 131.7 141.7 145.6 146.2 152 166.1 170.2 Depth_To 10.2 16 17 20.6 21.6 28.1 38 42 43 48.5 58.1 60.1 60.8 61.5 74.2 74.9 80.5 81.3 84.2 186.5 189 203.2 210.1 211 211.8 212.3 213.1 214.1 218.4 270 14.4 15.9 16.9 17.4 18 18.5 38.9 40.4 43.8 44.3 44.9 45.4 51.5 53.5 54.2 54.8 55.7 57.2 58 59 60.5 61.5 62 62.5 63.5 64.4 67.4 69.7 71.1 72 72.5 78.3 87 129.8 130.3 131.7 141.7 145.6 146.2 152 166.1 170.2 170.8 Cu_pct Pb_pct Zn_pct 0.175 0.0004 0.011 0.137 0.0006 0.0585 0.166 0.0009 0.037 2.94 0.265 0.0647 0.0908 0.173 0.253 0.1975 0.0004 0.0483 0.129 0.0004 0.0297 0.908 0.0006 0.0238 2.59 0.001 0.0385 0.621 0.0004 0.0229 0.286 0.0003 0.0078 0.317 0.106 0.0003 0.0003 0.0146 0.0225 0.304 1.985 0.259 0.0003 0.0011 0.0003 0.0249 0.0247 0.0102 0.275 0.0002 0.0093 0.1215 0.41 0.1365 0.1175 0.264 0.225 0.0002 0.0003 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 -0.0002 0.0108 0.0115 0.0089 0.0089 0.008 0.0083 0.125 0.0003 0.0095 0.1975 0.0005 0.0113 0.306 0.0133 0.026 Notes not assayed no significant intercept HCORE no significant intercept HCORE no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept HCORE no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept HCORE HCORE no significant intercept HCORE no significant intercept HCORE no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept HCORE no significant intercept HCORE no significant intercept HCORE no significant intercept not assayed not assayed no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept HCORE no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept no data no significant intercept HCORE HCORE not assayed no significant intercept HCORE HCORE HCORE no significant intercept HCORE no significant intercept HCORE HCORE HCORE HCORE HCORE HCORE no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept HCORE no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept HCORE no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept HCORE Hole_ID VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_008A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A VU_24_DD_027A Depth_From 170.8 172 173.1 174.2 175.3 177.3 203.5 205.5 214.3 215.6 216.1 221 221.5 222 222.5 0 47.9 49.5 73.2 98 105 111.9 164.5 166.2 172.3 172.8 173.5 174.2 174.8 185.3 188 194.5 196.9 221.8 228 Depth_To 172 173.1 174.2 175.3 177.3 203.5 205.5 214.3 215.6 216.1 221 221.5 222 222.5 268 47.9 49.5 73.2 98 105 111.9 164.5 166.2 172.3 172.8 173.5 174.2 174.8 185.3 188 194.5 196.9 221.8 228 251 Cu_pct 1.02 0.965 2.42 1.97 Pb_pct 0.0074 0.0081 0.0062 0.0051 Zn_pct 0.0484 0.0374 0.0621 0.0834 0.119 0.0004 0.0167 1.63 0.0027 0.0206 0.273 0.278 0.0112 0.0042 3.59 2.16 Notes HCORE HCORE HCORE HCORE no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept no data no significant intercept HCORE not assayed no significant intercept HCORE no significant intercept not assayed not assayed no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept HCORE HCORE no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept not assayed no significant intercept not assayed This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com. RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services. For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange use the personal data you provide us, please see our Privacy Policy. END DRLGZGMZNNFGKZG